Abstract The quality of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential in predicting the outcome of a cardiac arrest. The manual CPR is an alternative to mechanical chest-compression. Animal and physiological statistics indicate that the mechanical chest-compression devices are effective than the manual CPR. For that reason, there have been many attempts and much interest in developing the new techniques and equipment to improve the efficiency of CPR. This write up will consider comparison between manual and mechanical CPR, compare their effectiveness, cost, and the survival rate. Besides, studies with specific on perfusion pressure data and physiology comparing original types of mechanical devices and current devices and finally discussion of its use in various age groups and the efficacy of interposed ventilations with the devices (Steen 2002).
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more